{"id":1714,"date":"2019-11-15T13:10:11","date_gmt":"2019-11-15T15:10:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/?page_id=1714"},"modified":"2019-11-15T13:13:21","modified_gmt":"2019-11-15T15:13:21","slug":"minicurso-dialogos-entre-arte-e-politica-resistindo-ao-anti-intelectualismo","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/minicurso-dialogos-entre-arte-e-politica-resistindo-ao-anti-intelectualismo\/","title":{"rendered":"MINICURSO DI\u00c1LOGOS ENTRE ARTE E POL\u00cdTICA: RESISTINDO AO ANTI-INTELECTUALISMO"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Mestrando Sergio Schargel Maia de Menezes (PUC-Rio)<\/b><\/p>\n

Em \u00e9pocas de ascens\u00e3o do anti-intelectualismo, a pol\u00edtica da pol\u00edtica consiste em um permanente ataque \u00e0 arte, que, por conta pr\u00f3pria, adota a pol\u00edtica de resist\u00eancia. Por si s\u00f3, essa quest\u00e3o gera outras abordagens epistemol\u00f3gicas: \u00e9 poss\u00edvel falar de arte sem falar de pol\u00edtica? \u00c9 poss\u00edvel ser apol\u00edtico na arte? O que significa discutir pol\u00edtica e arte no Brasil de hoje? Ministrada por um pesquisador de ci\u00eancia pol\u00edtica e um pesquisador de literatura, a principal proposta deste minicurso \u00e9 que seja criado um debate das rela\u00e7\u00f5es dial\u00f3gicas entre arte e pol\u00edtica no Brasil contempor\u00e2neo, discutindo conceitos como poder, hegemonia, ur-fascismo e anti-intelectualismo. Importante ressaltar que o minicurso n\u00e3o tem inten\u00e7\u00e3o panflet\u00e1ria: n\u00e3o almeja, de forma alguma, atacar ou falar sobre partidos espec\u00edficos, mas sim oferecer um panorama geral da rela\u00e7\u00e3o simbi\u00f3tica entre arte e pol\u00edtica, a representa\u00e7\u00e3o de conceitos pol\u00edticos espec\u00edficos na literatura e as metodologias de resist\u00eancia que a arte pode assumir frente ao anti-intelectualismo. <\/span>Com os recentes e constantes cortes na arte, cultura, ci\u00eancia e tecnologia, bem como com a ascens\u00e3o do anti-intelectualismo, justifica-se a relev\u00e2ncia deste trabalho pela necessidade de se trazer um debate poli\u00e1rquico sobre a import\u00e2ncia da arte e da cultura para o pleno exerc\u00edcio do Estado democr\u00e1tico de direito, com particular aten\u00e7\u00e3o no que tange \u00e0s formas com que a arte pode assumir para resistir ao autoritarismo e ao ur-fascismo. <\/span>A escolha de um pesquisador dos dois campos de saber referentes a proposta n\u00e3o se deu por acaso: acreditamos que a contribui\u00e7\u00e3o de ambos ser\u00e1 fundamental para debater as quest\u00f5es propostas; um contribuir\u00e1 inevitavelmente com uma an\u00e1lise mais liter\u00e1ria dos temas levantados, enquanto o outro fornecer\u00e1 um exame mais voltado \u00e0 pol\u00edtica em si. Realizaremos, assim, uma din\u00e2mica dial\u00e9tica, onde um ir\u00e1 consecutivamente complementar o que foi levantado pelo outro, permitindo um debate s\u00f3lido sobre as quest\u00f5es propostas e mesmo a forma\u00e7\u00e3o de um dissenso, que, como diz Jacques Ranci\u00e8re, \u00e9 fundamental \u00e0 democracia. <\/span>Temos a inten\u00e7\u00e3o de que o minicurso seja aberto para todos, sem requisitos necess\u00e1rios para que a discuss\u00e3o seja acompanhada. Obviamente que, dada a possibilidade, conhecimento anterior relativo aos temas e subtemas \u00e9 \u00fatil. Assim, a leitura de livros que permear\u00e3o direta ou indiretamente o minicurso como A raz\u00e3o populista, de Ernesto Laclau, O fascismo eterno, de Umberto Eco, Como funciona o fascismo, de Jason Stanley, N\u00e3o vai acontecer aqui, de Lewis Sinclair e Microf\u00edsica do poder, de Foucault, s\u00e3o certamente adendos, mas n\u00e3o s\u00e3o absolutamente necess\u00e1rios. A ideia \u00e9 que o curso seja voltado \u00e0 comunidade acad\u00eamica em si, especialmente estudantes de cursos relacionados a artes, mas aberto \u00e0 todos. “<\/span><\/p>\n

Dialogues between art and politics: Resisting anti-intellectualism<\/p>\n

“In times of rising anti-intellectualism, politics of politics consists of a permanent attack on art, which, on its own, adopts the politics of resistance. By itself, this question generates some other epistemological approaches: Is it possible to speak of art without speaking of politics? Is it possible to be apolitical in art? What does it mean to discuss politics and art in Brazil today? Taught by a political science researcher and a literature researcher, the main purpose of this short course is to create a debate on the dialogical relations between art and politics in contemporary Brazil, discussing concepts such as power, hegemony, ur-fascism and anti-intellectualism. Nevertheless, the short course has no pamphleteering intent: It does not in any way aim to attack or talk about specific parties, but rather to provide an overview of the symbiotic relationship between art and politics, the representation of specific political concepts in the literature, and the methodologies of resistance that art can assume against anti-intellectualism. <\/span>With the recent and constant attacks towards art, culture, science and technology, as well as the rise of anti-intellectualism, the relevance of this work is justified by the need to bring a polyarchic debate on the importance of art and culture for the full exercise of the democratic rule of law, with particular attention to the paths of which art can take to resist authoritarianism and ur-fascism. <\/span>The choice of a researcher from the two fields of knowledge related to the proposal was not by chance: we believe that the contribution of both will be fundamental to debate the proposed questions; one will inevitably contribute to a more literary analysis of the issues raised, while the other will provide a more focused examination of politics itself. Thus, we will realize a dialectical dynamic, where one will consecutively complement what was raised by the other, allowing a solid debate on the proposed issues and even the formation of a dissent, which, as Jacques Ranci\u00e8re says, is fundamental to democracy. <\/span>We intend for the short course to be open for everyone, without any necessary requirements for the discussion to be followed. Obviously, given the possibility, prior knowledge of the themes and subthemes is helpful. Thus, reading books that will directly or indirectly permeate the short course as Ernesto Laclau’s The Populist Reason, Umberto Eco’s Eternal Fascism, Jason Stanley’s How Fascism Works, Won’t Happen Here, by Lewis Sinclair and Microphysics of Power, by Foucault are certainly additions, but they are not absolutely necessary. The idea is for the course to be more focused towards the academic community itself, especially students of arts-related courses, but open to everyone.<\/span><\/p>

Sala 310<\/span><\/p>

Dia 28 de novembro<\/p>

Hor\u00e1rio: 09:30-12:30<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mestrando Sergio Schargel Maia de Menezes (PUC-Rio) Em \u00e9pocas de ascens\u00e3o do anti-intelectualismo, a pol\u00edtica da pol\u00edtica consiste em um permanente ataque \u00e0 arte, que, por conta pr\u00f3pria, adota a pol\u00edtica de resist\u00eancia. Por si s\u00f3, essa quest\u00e3o gera outras abordagens epistemol\u00f3gicas: \u00e9 poss\u00edvel falar de arte sem falar de pol\u00edtica? \u00c9 poss\u00edvel ser apol\u00edtico […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1714","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1714"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1716,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1714\/revisions\/1716"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}