{"id":1390,"date":"2019-07-07T00:55:36","date_gmt":"2019-07-07T03:55:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/?page_id=1390"},"modified":"2019-07-07T02:09:37","modified_gmt":"2019-07-07T05:09:37","slug":"st-11-cultura-digital-e-narrativas-hibridas-a-memoria-em-processo","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/st-11-cultura-digital-e-narrativas-hibridas-a-memoria-em-processo\/","title":{"rendered":"ST 11- Cultura digital e narrativas h\u00edbridas: a mem\u00f3ria em processo"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Dranda. Priscila Chagas Oliveira (UFPEL)<\/p>\n

Dra. Daniele Borges Bezerra (UFPEL)<\/p>\n

Dr. Jo\u00e3o Fernando Igansi Nunes (UFPEL)<\/p>\n

RESUMO<\/strong><\/p>\n

O advento da cultura digital e das tecnologias computacionais fez emergir um processo sociocultural de integra\u00e7\u00e3o da vida social com a tecnologia (L\u00c9VY, 1999; LEMOS, 2007). O ciberespa\u00e7o, novo espa\u00e7o representacional de dados, torna-se habit\u00e1vel e habitado por diferentes sujeitos que ali se relacionam, produzem e consomem conte\u00fados, compartilhando suas trajet\u00f3rias. Presenciamos n\u00e3o s\u00f3 a hibridiza\u00e7\u00e3o dos meios, das linguagens e das narrativas (SANTAELLA, 2003), mas a sua converg\u00eancia: m\u00eddias outrora offline convergem com m\u00eddias digitais online, tornamo-nos seres c\u00edbridos (BEIGUELMAN, 2010). Essa conjuntura contempor\u00e2nea, ao mesmo tempo em que causa um sentimento euf\u00f3rico, associado \u00e0s virtualidades das tecnologias digitais em estado de expans\u00e3o constante, gera receios e cr\u00edticas \u00e0 cultura do eu (self), aos comportamentos cada vez mais fluidos e as rela\u00e7\u00f5es cada vez mais ef\u00eameras (TURKLE, 2011). O fato \u00e9 que a cultura digital consolida-se dia ap\u00f3s dia, e n\u00e3o h\u00e1 como desprezar os seus impactos sociais, pol\u00edticos e culturais. Como consequ\u00eancia, v\u00ea-se surgir uma cultura da mem\u00f3ria, marcada pela inscri\u00e7\u00e3o do eu (self) nas redes sociais, atrav\u00e9s de narrativas \u201cverbo-visuais\u201d (BRUNO, 2007), que t\u00eam como diferencial o car\u00e1ter ub\u00edquo das intera\u00e7\u00f5es. Essa nova forma de intera\u00e7\u00e3o social que permite registrar e transmitir experi\u00eancias por meio de narrativas h\u00edbridas, criadas ou transpostas para o universo digital, nos permite atualizar o pensamento de Walter Benjamin, com rela\u00e7\u00e3o a uma quest\u00e3o que lhe foi t\u00e3o cara em suas cr\u00edticas \u00e0 modernidade. Para o autor o \u201cof\u00edcio do narrador\u201d (BENJAMIN, 1987) como um meio de transmiss\u00e3o \u201cde boca em boca\u201d (idem), encontraria sua ru\u00edna na modernidade, no entanto, seria fortuito considerar que o surgimento dos meios de \u201creprodutibilidade t\u00e9cnica\u201d (idem), tamb\u00e9m criaram outros suportes para a mem\u00f3ria, ampliando as formas de transmiss\u00e3o. Seria, portanto, tempo de compreender as narrativas, sejam elas visuais, verbais, sonoras ou h\u00edbridas, no contexto em que s\u00e3o formuladas, como reflexo dos recursos e das rela\u00e7\u00f5es estabelecidas no tempo presente, n\u00e3o como ru\u00edna, mas como desdobramento de um modo de fazer, que segue pautado na l\u00f3gica da transmiss\u00e3o, agora por meio do compartilhamento em rede. Uma forma de \u201csalvar pela c\u00f3pia\u201d (QUARANTA, 2014). Deste modo, este simp\u00f3sio tem\u00e1tico acolhe trabalhos que abordem os desafios e possibilidades descortinados pela cultura digital, sobretudo no que se refere \u00e0s novas subjetividades instauradas pela rela\u00e7\u00e3o humano-m\u00e1quina no \u00e2mbito das narrativas visuais, verbais, sonoras, hipertexto, testemunhos, entre outros. O objetivo \u00e9 reunir pesquisas multidisciplinares que contemplem em suas propostas a compreens\u00e3o desta din\u00e2mica social emergente, fomentando, simultaneamente, novas quest\u00f5es que possam evidenciar as profundas altera\u00e7\u00f5es introduzidas pelos processos de cria\u00e7\u00e3o, gest\u00e3o e transmiss\u00e3o das mem\u00f3rias por meio de narrativas online.<\/p>\n

Palavras-Chave: <\/strong>cultura digital; tecnologias digitais; narrativas h\u00edbridas; mem\u00f3rias em processo; rela\u00e7\u00e3o humano-m\u00e1quina<\/p>\n


<\/strong><\/p>

Digital culture and hybrid narratives: the memory in process<\/strong><\/p>\n

ABSTRACT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The advent of digital culture and computational technologies has emerged a sociocultural process of integrating of social life with technology (L\u00c9VY, 1999; LEMOS, 2007). Cyberspace, a new representational space for data, becomes inhabitable and inhabited by different individuals who interact, produce and consume content, sharing their trajectories. We see not only the hybridization of media, languages and narratives (SANTAELLA, 2003), but their convergence: offline media converge with online digital media, we become cybrid individuals (BEIGUELMAN, 2010). This contemporary time, while causing a euphoric feeling associated with the virtualities of digital technologies in a state of constant expansion, generates fears and critiques of the culture of \u201cself\u201d, increasingly fluid behaviors and the ephemerality of relations (TURKLE, 2011). The fact is that digital culture is consolidates day by day, and there is no denying its social, political and cultural impacts. As a consequence, a culture of memory emerges, marked by the inscription of the self in the social networks, through “verbo-visual” narratives (BRUNO, 2007), whose differential is the ubiquitous nature of interactions. This new form of social interaction, that allows us to record and transmit experiences through hybrid narratives, created or transposed to the digital universe, allows us to update the thinking of Walter Benjamin, an issue that was so expensive in his criticisms of modernity. For the author, the “office of the narrator” (BENJAMIN, 1987) as a means of “word of mouth” transmission (idem), would find its ruin in modernity, however, it would be fortuitous to consider that the emergence of the means of “technical reproducibility “(Idem), also created other supports for memory, expanding the forms of transmission. It would, therefore, be time to understand the narratives, whether visual, verbal, sonorous or hybrid, in the context in which they are formulated, as a reflection of the resources and relationships established in the present time, not as a ruin, but as an unfolding of a mode of do, which follows the logic of the transmission, now through network sharing. A way to “save by copy” (QUARANTA, 2014). In this way, this thematic symposium welcomes works that address the challenges and possibilities unveiled by the digital culture, especially with regard to the new subjectivities established by the human-machine relationship in the scope of visual narratives, verbal, sound, hypertext, testimonies, among others. The objective is to bring together multidisciplinary researches that contemplate in their proposals the understanding of this emerging social dynamics, simultaneously fostering new questions that can highlight the profound changes introduced by the processes of creation, management and transmission of memories through online narratives.<\/p>\n

Keyword: <\/strong>digital culture; digital technologies; hybrid narratives; in-process memories; human-machine relationship<\/p>


<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dranda. Priscila Chagas Oliveira (UFPEL) Dra. Daniele Borges Bezerra (UFPEL) Dr. Jo\u00e3o Fernando Igansi Nunes (UFPEL) RESUMO O advento da cultura digital e das tecnologias computacionais fez emergir um processo sociocultural de integra\u00e7\u00e3o da vida social com a tecnologia (L\u00c9VY, 1999; LEMOS, 2007). O ciberespa\u00e7o, novo espa\u00e7o representacional de dados, torna-se habit\u00e1vel e habitado por […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1390","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1390"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1390\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1456,"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1390\/revisions\/1456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/claec.org\/ehm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}